FFIEC header image
Reports - Findings from Analysis of Nationwide
Summary Statistics for 2001 Community Reinvestment Act Data
Fact Sheet (July 2002)


Tables are in Portable Document Format (PDF).

The following analysis of nationwide summary statistics is based on data compiled by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) for institutions reporting under Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations.


The CRA is intended to encourage federally insured commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they are chartered. The CRA regulations require larger commercial banks and savings associations to report data on their small business, small farm, and community development lending. The institutions subject to these requirements generally include independent institutions with total assets of $250 million or more and institutions of any size if owned by a holding company that has assets of $1 billion or more. Under the CRA regulations, small business loans are loans of $1 million or less; small farm loans are loans of $500,000 or less. The small business and small farm lending data, when coupled with information reported about the geographic locations that constitute each reporting institution's local CRA assessment area(s), make it possible to better evaluate the performance of reporting institutions under the CRA lending test.1

The small business and small farm lending data reported under the CRA regulations differ from the data reported on home mortgage lending under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) in several respects. Unlike the HMDA data, the CRA data include information only on loans originated or purchased, not on applications that are denied or are withdrawn by the applicant. In addition, the CRA data do not include information about applicant income, sex, or racial or ethnic background, although the CRA data do indicate whether a loan is extended to a borrower with annual revenues of $1 million or less. Finally, the CRA data are not reported application-by-application, as HMDA data are, but rather are aggregated into three loan-size categories and then reported at the census tract level.

CRA data furnish a valuable tool for many different types of analyses. At the same time, the analysis of CRA data poses challenges. For example, lending institutions are asked to report the geographic location of the small business or small farm receiving the loan. However, the borrower may have used those funds to support business activities in other locations. Thus, assessment of the data may categorize a loan by the characteristics of the reported geography (typically a census tract) even though the funds are used to support the activities of a firm's offices in a location with different characteristics.

Perhaps more importantly, while CRA data provide information on extensions of credit in a geographic area, they do not indicate the amount or nature of the overall demand for credit there. Thus, caution should be used in drawing conclusions from analyses using only CRA data, as differences in local loan volume may reflect differences in local demand, among other things. Indeed, CRA performance assessments by the supervising agencies focus on evaluating the volume and distribution of lending in the context of local credit needs.

General Description of the 2001 CRA Data

A total of 1,912 lenders reported data on small business and small farm lending in 2001, including 1,443 commercial banks and 469 savings associations (table 1). Most of the reporting institutions (74 percent) had assets under $1 billion, including 15 percent that had assets under $250 million (derived from table 3). (As indicated above, independent institutions with assets under $250 million are not required to report these data.) Compared with 2000, the number of reporters has changed very little (down 1 percent).

Because the CRA data do not include the lending of all commercial banks and savings associations, the data do not fully represent all small business and small farm lending by these types of institutions. Nonetheless, covered institutions represent a significant portion of such lending, particularly to small businesses. Analysis of Call Report data on small loans to businesses and farms indicates that CRA reporters account for about 84 percent of the small business loans outstanding measured by number of loans and 75 percent measured by dollars and 32 percent of the small farm loans outstanding measured by number of loans and 38 percent measured by dollars extended by all commercial banks and savings associations (table 1).

In the aggregate, about 6 million small business loans, totaling $225 billion, and about 235,000 small01/15/2009 10:56 AM (table 2). Reported loans include both originations during 2001 and purchases of loans during that year. Unlike home mortgage lending, a well developed secondary market for small business loans does not exist, and the CRA data reflect this.2 Most reported small business and small farm loans were originations; less than 1 percent of the loans of either type were reported as purchases from another institution (derived from table 2).

The CRA data provide information about the size of small business and small farm loans. For small business loans, the maximum loan size reported is $1 million; for small farm loans the maximum is $500,000. In 2001, the average small business loan was approximately $37,000 and the average small farm loan was about $61,000 (derived from table 2). Measured by number of loans, 92 percent of the small business loans and 83 percent of the small farm loans were for amounts under $100,000 (table 2). Measured by dollars, the distribution differs: 30 percent of the small business loan dollars and 38 percent of the small farm loan dollars were extended through loans of less than $100,000 (table 2).

The CRA data include information on how many of the reported loans were extended to businesses or farms with revenues of $1 million or less. Such firms fall within generally accepted definitions of a small business, although somewhat larger firms are also often categorized as being a small business or small farm. For 2001, 44 percent of the reported small business loans and 90 percent of the small farm loans (measured by number of loans) were extended to firms with revenues of $1 million or less (table 2). The data also show that, on average, loans to firms with revenues under $1 million are about the same size as loans to larger firms. For example, for 2001, the average business loan to small firms was about $38,500 while the average loan to larger businesses was roughly $35,700 (derived from table 2). This relationship is contrary to expectations and to relationships found in years prior to 2000 when small business loans to small firms were on average about two-thirds the size of loans to larger firms. The pattern found in the 2001 data (as well as in the 2000 data) may reflect the substantial volume of credit card lending to larger businesses in the past two years. Such loans tend to be for relatively small amounts.

Most of the reported small business loans (about 88 percent measured by number of loans and 93 percent measured by dollars of loans) were either originated or purchased by commercial banks (data not shown). This preponderance of commercial banks in small business lending is consistent with data provided by other sources, including the Federal Reserve's 1987, 1993, and 1998 National Surveys of Small Business Finances, which show that commercial banks are the predominant source of credit for small businesses.3

Larger commercial banks and savings associations (those with assets of $1 billion or more) originated or purchased about 73 percent of the reported small business loans (table 3). These larger banks and savings associations represent a minority, however, of the institutions reporting such loans. No significant differences between commercial banks and savings associations were observed in this regard; larger institutions did the majority of small business lending within their institutional categories (data not shown). The overall pattern differs for small farm loans, where larger institutions accounted for about half of the loans. These patterns are little changed from previous years.

Reconciling the Numbers

The 2001 CRA data show a relatively large increase (about 19 percent) over the 2000 data in the total number of small business loans originated, with about 90 percent of the increase occurring in loans of $100,000 or less (data not shown in tables). Several factors may explain why small business lending increased so much from 2000 to 2001. First, some reporters were involved in mergers and acquisitions that brought previously uncovered institutions under the data reporting requirements. Second, some institutions reported the activity of new affiliates for the first time. Third, new rules regarding the reporting of loan renewals could account for some of the change in reported activity.4 A similar, although larger, change was observed for reported data between 1999 and 2000. The earlier change appears to be the consequence of a large increase in reported credit card activity. The change from 2000 to 2001 does not appear to be credit card related. Analysis of data submitted by lending institutions specializing in credit card activities shows little net change in activity.5

The Geographic Distribution of Small Business and Small Farm Lending

The availability of information about the geographic location of businesses and farms receiving credit provides an opportunity to examine the distribution of small business and small farm lending across areas grouped by their socio-demographic and economic characteristics. Information on the distribution of business and population provide some context within which to view these distributions.

CRA performance assessments include an analysis of the distribution of small business and small farm loans (of all types) across census tracts grouped into four neighborhood income categories: low-, moderate-, middle-, and upper-income.6 Overall, the distribution of the number and the dollar amounts of small business loans across these categories parallels the distribution of population and businesses across these four income groups (tables 4.1 and 4.2).7 For example, low-income areas include about 4.9 percent of the population and about 4.6 percent of the businesses, and received about 4.0 percent of the number and about 4.9 percent of the total dollar amount of small business loans.8

Comparing small business lending activity in low- and moderate-income areas in 2001 with 2000 finds that the share of the total number of loans and of the dollar amount of lending in these areas remained about the same. The same year-over-year pattern is observed for lending in middle- and upper-income areas.

When comparing the distribution of small business lending reported under the CRA across central city, suburban, and rural areas, small business loans are heavily concentrated in U.S. central city and suburban areas (about 84 percent of the number or dollar amount of all small business loans), as are the bulk of the U.S. population and the number of businesses (tables 4.1 and 4.2). In lower-income areas, most small business loans (about 90 percent) occur in central city census tracts; in higher-income areas, small business loans are most frequently made in suburban areas. Most small farm loans are made in rural areas regardless of income (about 75 percent of the number of loans and 69 percent of the dollar amount of such lending) (tables 4.3 and 4.4).

Community Development Lending

In addition to information about small business and small farm lending, institutions covered by the CRA data reporting requirements also disclose the number and dollar amount of their community development loans. Among the 1,912 reporting institutions in 2001, about 59 percent extended community development loans (derived from table 5). For 2001, 26,043 community development loans totaling about $25 billion were reported (table 5). The total number of reported community development loans is larger than in 2000, up about 8 percent measured by number of loans and 25 percent by dollars. The new rules allowing institutions to report loan renewals as additional loans may account for some of the increased lending.

As in earlier years, on average, community development loans are much larger ($945,000) than the typical small business loan ($37,000) reported in the CRA data. Larger lenders (assets of $1 billion or more) extended the bulk of community development loans, measured both by number of loans and by dollars.


1. The regulations that implement the CRA provide three performance tests for large retail institutions: a lending test, an investment test, and a service test. The lending test focuses primarily on the geographic distribution of lending, considering the proportion of loans extended within the institution's local community and the distribution of these loans among different types of borrowers and neighborhoods.

2. The one exception is for small business loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. See "Report to the Congress on Markets for Small Business and Commercial Mortgage Related Securities," Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (September 1996).

3. See Rebel A. Cole, John D. Wolken, and R. Louise Woodburn, "Bank and Nonbank Competition for Small Business Credit: Evidence from the 1987 and 1993 National Surveys of Small Business Finances," Federal Reserve Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 11 (November 1996), pp. 983 995; and Marianne P. Bitler, Alicia M. Robb, and John D. Wolken, "Financial Services Used by Small Businesses: Evidence from the 1998 Survey of Small Business Finances," Federal Reserve Bulletin, vol. 87, no. 4 (April 2001), pp. 183-206.

4. These rules allow institutions to report as a loan origination one renewal per small business loan per year, unless an increase in the loan amount is granted. If an institution increases the loan amount, it always reports the increase as a loan origination. 66 FR 36643 (July 12, 2001).

5. Two institutions reported large decreases in activity, the first involving 300,000 loans for about $3 billion, the second 160,000 loans totaling about $1 billion. The former institution attributes its decline to reduced marketing. The latter was involved in a reorganization and its loans are now reported by an affiliated institution; at the same time, this affiliate reported a large increase, about 440,000 loans for about $4 billion.

6.For purposes of the regulations, a low-income census tract has a median family income that is less than 50 percent of the median family income for the broader area (either metropolitan area or non-metropolitan portion of a state); a moderate-income tract, 50 percent to less than 80 percent; a middle-income tract, 80 percent to less than 120 percent; and an upper-income tract, 120 percent or more.

7.Beginning with 1998 data, institutions filing CRA data were allowed to report that the census tract location of a firm or farm receiving a loan was unknown. For 2001, 4.9 percent of the reported small business loans by number and 1.2 percent by loan dollars included such a designation.

8.Data on the share of population across census tract income categories is derived from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing (most current available). Data on the share of businesses across census tract income categories is derived from information from Dunn and Bradstreet files of businesses. Calculations exclude agricultural-related firms.