Booklet: Outsourcing Technology Services
Section:
Risk Management

Subsection: Risk Assessment and Requirements
 

 

 

 

 

 

Action Summary additional information.

Outsourced IT services can contribute to operational risks (also referred to as transaction risks). Operational risk may arise from fraud, error, or the inability to deliver products or services, maintain a competitive position, or manage information. It exists in each process involved in the delivery of the financial institutions’ products or services. Operational risk not only includes operations and transaction processing, but also areas such as customer service, systems development and support, internal control processes, and capacity and contingency planning. Operational risk also may affect other risks such as interest rate, compliance, liquidity, price, strategic, or reputation risk as described below.

Bullet

Reputation risk—Errors, delays, or omissions in information technology that become public knowledge or directly affect customers can significantly affect the reputation of the serviced financial institutions. For example, a TSP’s failure to maintain adequate business resumption plans and facilities for key processes may impair the ability of serviced financial institutions to provide critical services to their customers.

Bullet

Strategic risk—Inadequate management experience and expertise can lead to a lack of understanding and control of key risks. Additionally, inaccurate information from TSPs can cause the management of serviced financial institutions to make poor strategic decisions.

Bullet

Compliance (legal) risk—Outsourced activities that fail to comply with legal or regulatory requirements can subject the institution to legal sanctions. For example, inaccurate or untimely consumer compliance disclosures or unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information could expose the institution to civil money penalties or litigation. TSPs often agree to comply with banking regulations, but their failure to track regulatory changes could increase compliance risk for their serviced financial institutions.

Bullet

Interest rate, liquidity, and price (market) risk—Processing errors related to investment income or repayment assumptions could lead to unwise investment or liquidity decisions thereby increasing market risks.

QUANTITY OF RISK CONSIDERATIONS
The quantity of risk associated with an outsourced IT service is subject to the function outsourced, the service provider, and the technology used by the service provider. Management should consider the following factors in evaluating the quantity of risk at the inception of an outsourcing decision.

Bullet

Risks pertaining to the function outsourced include:
  dash bullet Sensitivity of data accessed, protected, or controlled by the service provider;
  dash bullet Volume of transactions; and
  dash bullet Criticality to the financial institution’s business.

Bullet

Risks pertaining to the service provider include:
  dash bullet Strength of financial condition;
  dash bullet Turnover of management and employees;
  dash bullet Ability to maintain business continuity;
  dash bullet Ability to provide accurate, relevant, and timely Management Information Systems (MIS);
  dash bullet Experience with the function outsourced;
  dash bullet Reliance on subcontractors;
  dash bullet Location, particularly if cross-border (See Appendix C, Foreign-Based Third-Party Service Providers); and
  dash bullet Redundancy and reliability of communication lines.

Bullet

Risks pertaining to the technology used include:
  dash bullet Reliability;
  dash bullet Security; and
  dash bullet Scalability to accommodate growth.

REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION
The definition of business requirements sets the stage for all outsourcing actions and forms the basis for subsequent management of the outsourced activity. The requirements are developed through a process that identifies the functions or activities to be outsourced, assesses the risk of outsourcing those functions or activities, and establishes a baseline from which appropriate control measures can be identified. These requirements provide a basis for an understanding between the financial institution and the service provider as to what the risks are and how they will be managed and controlled.

Key Practices
Sound practices for the development of requirements include:

Bullet

Stakeholder involvement—All organizational groups who will be directly involved with the service provider or in using the contracted service should be represented in the development of product and service requirements.

Bullet

Integration—The development should result in requirements that support the subsequent steps of solicitation, selection, contracting, and monitoring.

Bullet

Documentation—Documentation will greatly assist in ensuring that the service contracted and delivered meets the institution’s requirements. Documentation will also allow for subsequent reviews of the processes’ adequacy and integrity.

Components
The requirements definition phase should result in a detailed document containing descriptions of the institution’s expectations relative to the outsourced service. The requirements document may consider, but is not limited by, the following high level topical components:

Bullet

Scope and nature
  dash bullet Service description;
  dash bullet Technology; and
  dash bullet Customer support.

Bullet

Standards and service levels
  dash bullet Availability and performance;
  dash bullet Change management;
  dash bullet Financial reporting;
  dash bullet Quality of service;
  dash bullet Security; and
  dash bullet Business continuity.

Bullet

Minimum acceptable service provider characteristics
  dash bullet Industry experience;
  dash bullet Management experience;
  dash bullet Technology and systems architecture;
  dash bullet Process controls;
  dash bullet Financial condition;
  dash bullet Reputation, including references;
  dash bullet Degree of reliance on third parties, subcontractors, or partners;
  dash bullet Legal, regulatory, and compliance history; and
  dash bullet Ability to meet future needs.

Bullet

Monitoring and reporting
  dash bullet Measurements and reporting criteria;
  dash bullet Right to audit;
  dash bullet Third-party reports; and
  dash bullet Coordination of responses to security events.

Bullet

Transition requirements
  dash bullet Initial migration of data to the service provider;
  dash bullet Implementation of necessary communications mechanisms;
  dash bullet Migration of data from the service provider at termination of contract; and
  dash bullet Staff training.

Bullet

Contract duration, termination, and assignment
  dash bullet Start and term;
  dash bullet Conditions and right to cancel;
  dash bullet Ownership of data;
  dash bullet Timely return of data in machine-readable format;
  dash bullet Costs of transition;
  dash bullet Limitations, as appropriate, governing assignment to third party;
  dash bullet Dispute resolution; and
  dash bullet Confidentiality of institution data.

Bullet

Contractual protections against liability
  dash bullet Indemnification;
  dash bullet Limitation of liability; and
  dash bullet Insurance.

When outsourcing to a subsidiary or affiliate is considered, management must assure that the components outlined above evidence an arms-length transaction. An arrangement between a financial institution and an affiliate or subsidiary should be on terms that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the institution, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with a non-affiliated third party.