| Booklet:
Audit
Section: Third-Party
Reviews of Technology Service Providers
|
| |
|
A
technology service provider (TSP) that processes work for several financial
institutions often is subject to separate audits by internal auditors
from each of the serviced institutions. These audits may duplicate each
other, creating a hardship on the provider’s management and resources.
The TSP can reduce that burden by arranging for its own third-party audit
to determine the status and reliability of internal controls.
A
third-party audit, in this context, is an audit of a TSP performed by
independent auditors who are not employees of either the TSP or the serviced
institution(s). The TSP, its auditors, or its serviced institutions may
engage the third-party auditor. The serviced institutions’ auditors
may use this third-party review to determine the scope of any additional
audit coverage they require to evaluate the system and controls at the
TSP. Examiners can also use the third-party review to help scope their
activities.
Financial
institutions are required to effectively manage their relationships with
key TSPs. Institution management meets this requirement related to audit
controls by:
| |
Directly
auditing the TSP’s operations and controls; |
| |
Employing
the services of external auditors to evaluate the TSP’s operations
and controls; or |
| |
Receiving
and reviewing sufficiently detailed independent audit reports from
the TSP. |
Institutions
using such audits to complement their own coverage should ensure that
the independent auditor was qualified to perform the review, that the
scope satisfies their own audit objectives and that any significant reported
deficiencies are corrected. It is critically important that the examiner
and the institution understand the nature and scope of the engagement
and the level of assurance accruing from the accounting firm’s work
product. Attest-level services are reviews that result in the expression
of an opinion by the reporting practitioner. See Chapter 1, “Attest
Engagements,” of Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements
(SSAE) No. 10, Attestation Standards: Revision and Recodification.
Advisory-level services can be strategic, diagnostic, implementation,
and sustaining/managing services, among others. See Statement on Standards
for Consulting Services (AICPA, Professional Standards, vol.
2, CS sec. 100). There is no expression of an opinion in Advisory Service
engagements.
Users
of audit reports should not rely solely on the information contained in
the report to verify the internal control environment of the TSP. They
should use additional verification and monitoring procedures as discussed
more fully in the IT Handbook’s “Outsourcing Technology
Services Booklet.” Refer to that booklet for additional information
on vendor management and to supplement the examination coverage in this
booklet.
The
following two types of reviews were developed by the AICPA and are frequently
used by independent accounting firms to provide assurance regarding the
internal controls of TSPs:
| |
SAS
70 reviews |
| |
Trust
services reviews |
SAS
70 REVIEWS
The objectives, scope, and audit procedures of each third-party audit
differ according to the needs of those engaging the auditor. The AICPA
Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) Number 70 provides guidance for
independent auditors when performing a SAS 70 audit of a service organization,
and when auditing financial statements of an entity that uses a service
organization to process its transactions.
SAS
70 provides a uniform reporting format for third-party reviews of TSPs
in order to facilitate the description and disclosure of the service provider’s
processes and controls to customers and their auditors. SAS 70 is a widely
recognized standard and indicates that a service provider has had its
control objectives and activities examined by an independent accounting
and auditing firm. A formal report including the auditor's opinion (service
auditor's report) is issued to the TSP at the conclusion of the SAS 70
process. The report contains a detailed description of the TSP’s
controls and an independent assessment of whether the controls are in
place and suitably designed for the service provider’s operations.
The independent assessment of controls is based on testing certain controls
to determine whether they are designed and operating with sufficient effectiveness
to achieve the related control objective for the specified time period.
There
are two types of service auditor's reports: a type I report provides the
service organization’s description of controls at a specific point
in time, and the auditor’s opinions as to whether the description
is presented fairly and whether the controls are suitably designed to
achieve the related control objectives; a type II report includes all
of the elements of the Type I report as well as actual testing of the
controls to determine whether they are operating with sufficient effectiveness
to achieve the related control objectives over a period of not less than
six months.
User
institutions can usually obtain service auditor's reports from their TSPs.
The fact that a provider chooses not to undergo a SAS 70 or other independent
review, or chooses not to disclose the results of the review, is a matter
that institutions should consider when performing due diligence to determine
whether to engage, or to continue to engage, the provider’s services.
TRUST SERVICES REVIEWS
The AICPA established its Trust Services Principles and Criteria, a core
set of principles, criteria and illustrative controls, to address the
risks of IT and to establish confidence in systems reliability and e-commerce
activities. Following are the Trust Services Principles and Criteria developed
by the AICPA for use by practitioners in the performance of a Trust Services
engagement:
| |
Security
– The system is protected against unauthorized access, both
physical and logical. |
| |
Availability
– The system is available for operation and use as committed
or agreed. |
| |
Processing
Integrity – System processing is complete, accurate, timely,
and authorized. |
| |
Online
Privacy – Personal information obtained as a result of e-commerce
is collected, used, disclosed, and retained as committed or agreed. |
| |
Confidentiality
– Information designated as confidential is protected as committed
or agreed. |
Each
of the principles and related criteria are organized into four broad areas
of review:
| |
Policy
– The institution has defined and documented its polices relevant
to the particular principal. |
| |
Communications
– The entity has communicated its defined policies to authorized
users. |
| |
Procedures
– The entity uses procedures to achieve its objectives in accordance
with its defined policies. |
| |
Monitoring
– The entity monitors the system and takes action to maintain
compliance with its defined policies. |
Licensed
accounting firms can offer a wide range of advisory and attest services
using the Trust Services Principles and Criteria. TSPs frequently engage
independent accounting firms to perform SysTrust and WebTrust Reviews,
two specific Trust Services reviews developed by the AICPA for reviewing
IT systems and controls.
|
|
SysTrust
– In this type of review, a licensed CPA provides independent
verification that a TSP has effective controls in place so that the
system can function reliably. The institution prepares a description
of the aspects of the system subject to be reviewed so that the scope
of the review is clear to readers of the report. This system description
is attached to the CPA’s report. The auditor determines the
presence of system controls and tests the effectiveness of the controls
during the period covered by the SysTrust report. If the review is
an attest-level engagement, the CPA firm’s attestation is represented
by the report to management and may also be represented by a SysTrust
seal on the institution’s website. |
|
|
WebTrust
– The objective of a WebTrust engagement is for a licensed CPA
to provide independent verification that an institution’s website
complies with the Trust Services Principles and Criteria in the particular
subject matter reviewed (i.e., confidentiality, security, etc.). If
the engagement is an attest-level review, assurance is represented
by the CPA’s report to management. An institution whose website
has met the Trust Services Principles and Criteria in a particular
subject matter area is eligible to display the WebTrust seal for that
area to provide independent verification that an institution’s
website is in compliance. Clicking on the WebTrust seal reveals the
date the seal was granted and the date it expires, the site's business
practices and policies, Trust Services Principles and Criteria used
to examine the site, the report of the independent accountant, as
well as links to other sites with active WebTrust seals. |
For
further information regarding third party engagements see the AICPA website
at www.aicpa.org.
|